Instructions for Authors
IJRDO - International Journal of Aeronautics and Space Studies welcomes high-quality and original manuscripts that contribute to the advancement of research in aeronautics, aerospace engineering, and space science. The journal provides an international platform for scholars, researchers, and professionals to disseminate innovative theoretical and applied research.
Manuscript Types Accepted
Original Research: Detailed studies reporting original research findings.
Review Articles: Comprehensive analyses of specific topics.
Case Studies: Documentation of experiments, systems, and applications contributing to aerospace knowledge.
Conceptual studies and theoretical papers.
General Submission Requirements
Manuscripts should be submitted in English. All submissions must be original work, not previously published, and not under consideration elsewhere. Submissions should adhere to the ethical guidelines applicable to research and publication. Conflicts of interest must be disclosed.
Manuscript Preparation
Title Page: Includes the title, authors' names and affiliations, and corresponding author details.
Abstract: No more than 250 words.
Keywords: Provide 3–5 keywords.
Text Organization: Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion.
References: APA style.
Figures and Tables: Placed within the text.
Supplementary Materials: Optional and published online only.
Formatting Requirements
Manuscripts should be submitted in Microsoft Word format. Use 12-point Times New Roman font. Text should be 1.5 spaced. Margins should be at least 1 inch on all sides.
Reviewer Guidelines
Peer Review Process
The journal follows a rigorous double-blind peer review system in which the identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the review process.
Manuscripts are evaluated solely on the basis of academic merit, originality, methodological rigour, and relevance to the journal’s scope.
This process is designed to ensure fairness, transparency, and high scholarly standards. All editorial decisions are made in accordance with internationally recognized ethical publishing guidelines.
Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
Reviewers play an essential role in maintaining the academic quality and integrity of the journal. They are responsible for providing objective, constructive, and evidence-based evaluations of submitted manuscripts.
Reviews should focus on the scientific merit of the research and provide recommendations that help improve the quality and clarity of the manuscript.
Considerations Before Accepting a Review
Subject Expertise: Reviewers should accept invitations only if the manuscript falls within their academic expertise.
Availability and Timeliness: Reviews should be completed within the specified timeframe to support efficient editorial decisions.
Conflicts of Interest: Any financial, professional, or personal conflict of interest must be disclosed to the editorial office before undertaking the review.
Criteria for Manuscript Evaluation
Originality: The manuscript should present new ideas or significant insights.
Scholarly Contribution: The research should contribute meaningfully to aerospace and space science fields.
Relevance: The manuscript should align with the thematic scope of the journal.
Structure and Clarity: The manuscript should be logically organised and clearly written.
Assessment of Manuscript Sections
Title: Should clearly represent the focus of the study.
Abstract: Should summarise objectives, methods, results, and conclusions.
Introduction: Should define the research problem and objectives.
Methodology: Should describe the research design and analytical approach.
Results: Should present findings clearly and logically.
Discussion and Conclusion: Should interpret findings and explain their significance.
Tables and Figures: Should be properly labelled and support the textual content.
Language and Clarity
Manuscripts should be written in clear and professional English. Authors are responsible for ensuring the grammatical accuracy and readability of the manuscript prior to submission.
Reviewer Reports and Recommendations
Summary of the manuscript
Major issues requiring revision
Minor comments and suggestions
Evaluation of originality and relevance
Assessment of methodology and results
Editorial Decisions
Accept
Minor Revisions
Major Revisions
Reject
Ethical Standards and Conduct
Confidentiality: Manuscripts must be treated as confidential documents.
Objectivity: Reviews must be impartial and based on academic reasoning.
Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers should identify relevant work not cited in the manuscript.
Integrity: Information obtained during peer review must not be used for personal advantage.
Quick Links
